The Effectiveness of Akm (Minimum Competency Assessment) Practice on Student’s English Learning Outcomes at SMA Negeri 11 Samarinda

Main Article Content

Elva Nadia Zulkarnain
Godefridus Bali Geroda
Widi Syahtia Pane

Abstract

In the learning process at school, of course, teachers and students have learning targets or minimum scores of success indexes that students must achieve. In that case, students' understanding and effective test tools in achieving learning outcomes are very necessary. The research was conducted by taking samples in the tenth grade at SMA Negeri 11 Samarinda, this study aims to see whether there is real significance if students are given different types and forms of tests in creating better learning outcomes. How important is the comfort and understanding of students in answering and understanding exercises or exams related to learning material. Therefore, researcher used AKM to try whether there is a significance in the ability to understand questions and increase learning outcomes. In the end, the results of the research show that AKM is effective for student learning outcomes. and is very good for measuring students' understanding abilities in learning material, especially English lesson.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Amanda, S. (2022). Hypotesis Testing. In Hypotesis Testing ( one sample T-test, p. Chapter 3).

Chu, PH. and Chang, Y. (2017). John W, Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 4(June), 3–5.

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fogart, R. J., Kerns, Y. G. M., Pete, B. M., Jan, W., & Ballou, C. (n.d.). LITERACY. Solution Tree Press

Ford-Baxter, Tiffanie, Kendall Faulkner, and Jennifer Masunaga. 2022. “Situating Information Literacy: A Case Study Exploring Faculty Knowledge of National Disciplinary Standards and Local Program Learning Outcomes.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 48(3):102523. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102523

Frankel, K. K., Becker, B. L. C., Rowe, M. W., & Pearson, P. D. (2016). From “What is Reading?” to What is Literacy? Journal of Education, 196(3), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600303

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and Researching Reading, Second Edition. In Teaching and Researching Reading, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833743

Herrera, H. (2019). Qualitative methods in Pharmacy Practice Research. Encyclopedia of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Pharmacy, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-128-12735-3.00138-2
Moje, E. B., Afflerbach, P. P., Enciso, P., & Lesaux, N. K. (2020). Handbook of Reading Research, Volume V. In Handbook of Reading Research, Volume V. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676302

O’Dowd, Robert. 2021. “What Do Students Learn in Virtual Exchange? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Learning Outcomes Across Multiple Exchanges.” International Journal of Educational Research 109(June):101804. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101804.

Pourhosein Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). How Can Students Improve Their Reading Comprehension Skill? Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i2.9201

Rohim, D. C., Rahmawati, S., & Ganestri, I. D. (2021). Konsep Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Sekolah Dasar untuk Siswa. Jurnal Varidika, 33(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v33i1.14993

Sage Publications. (2019). t Test: One-Sample, Two-Independent-Sample, and Related-Sample Designs. Comparing Means: Significance Testing, Effect Size and Confidence Intervals, 136

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabet.

B. A. B., Dan, M., & Penelitian, D. (2015). Bab iii metode dan desain penelitian 3.1. 32–56.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'